The People’s Herbalist: Nicholas Culpeper
The rebel herbalist of the mid-seventeenth century made medicine accessible to the poor.
June/July 2002
By SUSAN WITTIG ALBERT
Nicholas Culpeper, notorious bad-boy herbalist
of the mid-seventeenth century, may be responsible for giving
medical herbalism its long-standing reputation for quackery.
Vilified during his lifetime by the powerful Royal College of
Physicians for daring to translate their Latin Pharmacopoeia into
English, and denounced after his death for his beliefs, the name of
Nicholas Culpeper is still synonymous with superstition and
quasi-magical beliefs.
RELATED ARTICLES
Wrangling an“Herban” Legend January/February 2007 By Jessica Kellner More than 25 years af...
One of the most intriguing aspects of herbalism is the array of beautifully bound and carefully pro...
Gussy up your garden with herbal shrubs...
Viewpoints to consider...
And yet we owe a very great debt to this renegade, who made a
remarkably valuable contribution to the history and lore of herbs
by preserving the fascinating tradition of orally transmitted
superstitions and folk uses of plant medicines that dates from
classical antiquity through the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.
This oral lore belonged to the ordinary people, especially to the
peasants who lived in the villages and countryside, and to the
so-called witches, the wise ones who understood the ancient healing
uses of plants—what today we call “green medicine.”
From the beginnings of chemical medicine in Europe, around the
twelfth and thirteenth centuries, physicians and surgeons wanted to
eradicate the tradition of self-healing and replace it with their
own forms of care. With the cooperation of the church, they
actively harassed the village healers, making every effort to
discredit them and keep them from passing along their traditional
knowledge. When the healers were gone, their knowledge was gone
too. If it had not been for two men, a Swiss-German doctor known as
Paracelsus and an English apothecary’s apprentice—Culpeper—that
traditional knowledge might well have been erased. Paracelsus’
writings never achieved any great popularity, even in his homeland.
Culpeper, however, is a different story.
Life and times
Culpeper was born and died in a century when it was dangerous
for anyone but licensed physicians to possess and share medical
knowledge. It is to him, however, that we owe much of our
understanding of traditional herbal medicine, particularly that
connected with astrology. In fact, if it had not been for his
systematic documentation and preservation of this knowledge, and
his insistence that it be put into the people’s hands in a form
that they could use, the information would almost certainly have
been lost.
Culpeper was born in 1616 a.d. in Surrey, England. The Culpepers
were an aristocratic, land-owning family whose history went back to
the time of King John (who reigned from 1199 to 1216 a.d.).
Culpeper’s father, a young clergyman, died two weeks before his
son’s birth. Culpeper’s widowed mother took the boy to live near
her family. Her father, a clergyman who was also something of an
astrologer, taught the boy Greek and Latin and then sent him off to
Cambridge, where he was recognized as a brilliant scholar with a
great deal of promise. He was also headstrong and willful, however,
and within the year (1634) he had spent his father’s small fortune
and fallen passionately in love with a rich young woman. The pair
planned a clandestine marriage, but her coach was struck by
lightning on the way to the wedding and the bride was killed.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Next >>